Monday, May 25, 2020

Education Of A School s Physical Education Program

education in a school system equally. Looking at it from this standpoint, we can say physical education will have meaning when all of these factors are contributed and put together. We have to work together to implement physical education in the schools, but it will all be worth it in the long run (France, 2011, p.51). Staff, as stated from the article written by Huberty, is a big part of a school’s physical education program. Most of the participants and staff from this study believe physical activity is important, but limited because of the amount of homework given, pressure from peers, and the lack of ability to perform at home because of limited equipment. I believe all of these factors are important because this is something very†¦show more content†¦Taking into consideration those factors and learning to differentiate lessons for those students is very important for success and building of a physical education program. The most important part about a physica l education lesson is so each and every student is participating to his or her fullest and best ability, while also learning something. Whether or not a lesson has to be differentiated or adapted, they should all be learning (Ebbeck, 2015, p. 54). Saving the best for last, obesity. According to schools in Texas and Governor Rick Perry, these schools will be participating in physical education to reduce the beginning of diabetes. Since America is considered overweight, they did not think there was a better way to hopefully decrease obesity than to incorporate more physical education in to schools. â€Å"Kindergarten through fifth grade graders are required to exert for thirty minutes during PE or structured recess, which students will begin this fall† (Obesity, 2007, p.1). This also goes along with the taking away of recesses. We should not be taking away things, which benefit our students’ lives. Overall, physical education courses can help a students overall w ell being and health. This is the goal they aim to pursue at these Texas schools. They also are requiring mandatory testing based upon levels of attendance, meal

Thursday, May 14, 2020

Summary Of The International Monetary System Finance Essay - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 7 Words: 1957 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Finance Essay Type Analytical essay Did you like this example? The issues with globalization are not new and those issues associated with trade and how to pay for the transferred goods has definitely been around for a while. Currently the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is the organization that has been tasked with stabilizing the international monetary system, which can fluctuate at any time of the day. If the monetary system were allowed to fluctuate on its money countries would find themselves in a difficult situation, which they would have, very little impact on their own. The world has seen a number of different systems over the last 150 years, from the Gold Standard to the systems we have in place today. So far the IMF has been the most successful, but even it has had to make some drastic decisions, like the one in Argentina in 1991 the IMF ruled that it would not bail them out again. The Argentinean Economy was teetering and the IMF ruled that more loans would be futile. Argentinas money was tied to the US dollar, 1 for 1, but the system was failing and the IMF ruled that drastic measures would be needed, before more help could be provided. In the aftermath the economy and stability of the Argentine nation crashed (Blustein, 54). This is a drastic case, but the IMF must provide financial stability, it cannot just provide loans through the World Bank to hold off the inevitable. Before I get into the real mission of the IMF lets first take a look at a few of the international monetary systems that were used in the past. The first adoption of many of the functions of the modern international monetary system can be traced back to the gold standard. The gold standard was the system that was in use from the late 19th until early in 20th century up until just after World War I. The gold standard was based on the free circulation between nations of gold coins of standard specification, mainly based on the gold coins produced by the Royal Mint in England. Under the gold standard system, gold was the only standard of value; in short all currency and trade goods were fixed on the value of gold. The reason the gold standard collapsed was the lack of liquidity; the worlds supply of money in circulation was limited by the worlds supply of gold. The discovery of a new gold field could cause prices to rise. The increase in trade and other problems with the system caused the international gold standard break down in 1914. The gold standard was replaced by the gold bullion standard during the twenties under which nations no longer minted gold coins but backed their currencies with gold bullion and agreed to buy and sell the bullion at a fixed price. Similar issues caused the gold bullion standard system to collapse, and it only lasted about ten years. Gold continued to play an important part in the monetary system with the adoption of the Gold-Exchange System used in the period after World War II, trade was conducted according to the gold-exchange standard. The participating nations fixed the value of their currencies not with respect to gold, but to some foreign currency, which is in turn fixed to and redeemable in gold. Most nations fixed their currencies to the U.S. dollar and retained dollar reserves in the United States, which became known as the key currency country. The decision to go to ultimately go to the Gold-Exchange System was made at the Bretton Woods international conference in 1944. The result of the conference ultimately led to the creation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF would be tasked with maintaining a stable exchange rate on a global level (Galbraith, 160). The IMF continues to the present day and the world does not seem to be moving away from its support of the IMF. The IMF has dealt with two key changes in the way the monetary system has been dealt with, both involved US currency. The first led to the Two-Tier System which was occurred during the sixties, as U.S. commitments drew gold reserves from the nation. Thi s caused the dollar to weaken, leading some countries exchange dollars for gold, this led to a drain on U.S. gold reserves. The two-tier system was created in 1968, In the official tier, consisted of central bank gold traders, in this tier the value of gold was set at $35 an ounce, to keep gold reserves stable gold payments to no central bankers were prohibited (Mayer, 1). The second tie was the free-market tier, mainly all nongovernmental gold traders; golds price fluctuated like a normal market, through supply and demand. Gold and the U.S. dollar continued to be the major reserve asset for the worlds central banks. This system did not stop the drain on U.S. gold reserves; in 1971 the United States was forced to abandon gold convertibility. This action left the world without a single, unified international monetary system. This is considered to be the end of the fixed rate system, which evolved from the collapse of the gold standard way back in 1914 (Greider, 251). With the end of the two tiered system, there was a period of high inflation after the United States abandoned gold convertibility. This action forced the IMF to agree (1976) to a system of floating exchange rates, this formally ended the gold standard. The values of various currencies were to be determined by the market. This is something we experience today as we convert currency during international travel; it changes on a regular basis. The US dollar was and is still seen as the key currency, the Japanese yen and the German Deutschmark strengthened and became increasingly important in international financial markets. The introduction of the euro was introduced in financial markets in 1999 as replacement for eleven mainly European currencies (including the Deutschmark). It began circulating in 2002 in 12 EU nations; the euro replaced the European Currency Unit, which had become the second most commonly used currency after the dollar. Today, though in a downward trend, many large companies use the euro rather than the dollar in bond trading (Greider, 24). Now that I have explained the evolution of the monetary system, you might be asking what does the IMF do? The IMF is the worlds central organization for international monetary cooperation and is headquartered in Washington, DC. The organization depends on cooperation of all participating countries in the world to work together to promote the common good of the monetary system. The IMFs primary purpose is to ensure the stability of the international monetary system; which currently is a system of exchange rates and international payments that enables countries (and their citizens) to buy goods and services from each other. This action is essential for sustainable economic growth and to raise the living standards of the worlds population (IMF.COM). The IMF is currently trying to maintain economic stability and to prevent financial crises in the international monetary system. The IMF continuously reviews national, reg ional, and global economic markets for financial developments. It also provides advice to member countries, encouraging them to adopt policies that foster; Economic stability throughout the world Reduced the vulnerability to economic and financial crises Raise living standards The IMF also provides a forum where member countries can discuss the national, regional, and global consequences of their policies. The IMF also makes temporarily financing available to member countries to help them address balance of payments problems; when countries are short of foreign exchange because their payments to other countries exceed their foreign exchange earnings. This is the situation that Argentina found itself in, when the IMF denied them short term loans, like a banker the IMF must ensure they can repay the loan. The IMF also provides technical assistance and training to help countries build the expertise and institutions they need for economic stability and growth (IMF.COM). Obvi ously the as seen in the current recession the IMF cannot avoid every financial crisis, but it can help ensure that money is available to keep it spiraling out of control, much like the Great Depression of the 1930s. As I have stated the IMF is an organization of cooperating member countries. Crucial to the monetary system is the World Bank, they both have similar functions and the actions of each often appear as one, the Bank and the IMF are separate entities. To clear up the confusion it essential that the following differences are noted; The Bank is primarily a development institution. The IMF is a cooperative institution that seeks to maintain an orderly system of payments and receipts between nations. The IMF and the World Bank have and serve different purposes, they each have a distinct structure, funding is from different sources, assists different categories of members, and each have distinct goals(Greider, 75). To further help distinguish the IMF and the Worl d Bank, the bank has one primary goal; it promotes economic and social progress in developing countries. They accomplish this by helping to raise productivity so that their people may live a better and fuller life. This does not happen overnight and is not continuous, the general upward rise in the standard of living around the world since WW II is testament to the success of the World Bank. On the other hand remember the IMF tries to stabilize sudden and unpredictable variations in the monetary exchange values of national currencies. The IMF mainly functions on trust and cooperation, while the World Bank is the investment arm of the monetary system(Greider, 236). To help further define the World Bank it is made up of two organizations: the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Development Association (IDA). It should be noted to that another organization that has a role to play in the international monetary system is the International Financ e Corporation it provides funding for private enterprises in developing countries. The World Bank is the primary source of funding for countries, to help with the mission of the World Bank it employs an expertise in the following areas: economists, engineers, urban planners, agronomists, statisticians, lawyers, portfolio managers, loan officers, project appraisers, as well as experts in telecommunications, water supply and sewerage, transportation, education, energy, rural development, population and health care (IMF.Com). Since the demise of the fixed exchange rate system in 1971, primarily the flexible exchange rate system has been used to manage the international monetary system. The flex rate system seems to be more adaptable, to handle the constant changing landscape of the global economy. I think the fixed rate system is just too simple to handle the complexities of the modern system. The rate, at which news travels today, can be devastating on slow fixed rate system. The f lexible system also allows for countries to pursue an independent monetary policy, rather than have it set by a key currency such as the US Dollar. So far the flexible exchange rates have been more adaptable and have been able to distribute the burden of adjustment between the foreign economies and the domestic economy. A fixed rate system may be useful in a developing economy such as the previously mentioned Argentine case, but the change in the base currency (US Dollar) caused the devaluation of the Argentine peso. The Argentinean government was not able to recover fast enough to head off the economic collapse; in flexible system they may have been able to take proactive measures to avoid the situation they found themselves in. That is just a theory and it is yet to be seen if the Flexible system is better that the fixed rate system, but I am sure as there already has been changes that will impact the financial system, that will cause it adapt to some other policy. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Summary Of The International Monetary System Finance Essay" essay for you Create order

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Why Leaders Are Born Or Made - 1337 Words

There is a well-known and often asked question of whether leaders are born or made. While the origin of the question is unknown, the answers in response to the question are numerous. The terms leadership and management have become increasingly prevalent in today’s workplace. They are often used in place of each other and in some cases the terms leadership and management are used identically to each other. This has not always been the case. Leadership has a long history that dates as far back as biblical times. According to Bass, â€Å"it is one of the world’s oldest preoccupations† (Bass, 1990). On the other hand, management as it relates to the workplace is a relatively new concept in that it became more visible in organizations around the time of the Industrial Revolution. It was during this time that large scale industrial plants with their high number of employees were in need of people and processes that would make their complex and disorganized orga nizations operate smoothly and more efficiently (Kotter, 1990). As a result, management as it is known today became commonplace. The evolution of management since the Industrial Revolution has undergone many changes. It was the catalyst that brought about changes in the way management was perceived and administered in the workplace (Kotter, 2013). The management needs of organizations since the Industrial Revolution still require regulation, order, and consistency. Many modern day organizations often useShow MoreRelatedWhy Leaders Are Made Rather Than Born: Essay examples1105 Words   |  5 Pagesmyth is that leaders are born -- that there is a genetic factor to leadership...Thats nonsense; in fact, the opposite is true. Leaders are made rather than born. (Bennis). Others starkly disagree with Bennis and hold to the opinion that leaders are born. The popular opinion of several psychologists is that leadership is an inherited characteristic, and those that don’t inher it this gift have no chance of developing it on their own. Contrary to the popular belief that leaders are born, I believeRead MoreCharacteristics Of A Great Leader1379 Words   |  6 PagesTo be a great leader one must have many attributes or qualities. Some of the most important are flexibility, communication, courage, humility, and responsibility. A great leader must be flexible as being a leader usually consists of dealing with new challenges all the time, especially in the technological age. Communication consists of effectively conveying expectations and understanding how people will interpret the leader’s directions. A great leader must have the courage to see the path that theRead MoreBiography Of Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi, And Nelson Mandela1430 Words   |  6 Pagessomething that you were born with, hence the very popular saying Great leaders are born, not made (What Makes An Effective Leader). Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi, and Nelson Mandela were all great examples of people who were natural born leaders. These three leaders were very charismatic, which enabled them to gather many followers. To some extent, being born a leader was true because according to David Celeste, Qualities such as charisma with which one is born, is a leadership qualityRead MoreWhy Employees Are More Motivated Than Others And Implications820 Words   |  4 PagesWhy some employees are more motivated than others and implications, do the differences Some employees are more motivated by others because they have achieved an element of self-efficacy, whereby they can to achieve optimum performance by putting the right amount of energy towards the same. This aspect most often than not comes from an immense form of experience in which people continuously do a given exercise to an extent that they get well acquainted with the job and, therefore, able to deliverRead MoreAre Leaders Born Or Made?1372 Words   |  6 Pagesrespondents to answer the question ‘are leaders born or made?’ The results showed that 52.4% believed leaders are made, 19.1% felt leaders are born and 28.5% thought it was equal. The executives had differing opinions but the ‘leaders are made’ view was more popular. It also revealed that those who indicated ‘leaders are made’ believe that experience is more important than traits or training and what people learn over time is important. Those who indicated ‘leaders are born ’ believe traits and experienceRead MoreTransformational Leadeship in Organizations in the 21st Century1671 Words   |  7 PagesUniversity of Technology, Jamaica July 17, 2010 Table of Contents Page Title Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Management versus Leadership 3 Are Great Leaders Born or Made? 5 The Role of Transformational Leadership in Organizational Performance 6 Conclusion 7 References 8 Introduction Globalization along with the increasing dynamics of business today,Read MoreLeaders Are Born Not Made1283 Words   |  6 PagesLEADERS ARE BORN NOT MADE To begin this essay I would prefer to give a little scenario by asking ourselves, can all managers go on to be a leader? For several years, the concern whether leaders are born or made is an issue of great controversy. From different opinions however, it could be a little bit of both hence proving that any manager can go on to be a great leader as well. Among other definitions, Maxwell (1993, p.11) has defined leadership as an ability to influence others. He also definedRead MoreSimilarities Between Traits And Behavior Leadership Theories1684 Words   |  7 Pages Born or Created? Comparison between Traits and Behavior Leadership Theories Karolina Baez Soto Rochester Institute of Technology Abstract Are the leaders born or created? This ancient question has had many answers. In the Great Man and Trait Phase, theorist attempted to determine which specific traits make a person an effective leader. Great leaders are the focus of trait identification. After many years, Behavioral theorist focused their attention in which particular behaviors and stylesRead MoreAre Leaders Born or Made - Essay729 Words   |  3 PagesRunning Head: LEADERSHIP AT WORK Are leaders born or made? MBA 525-Professional Development April 10, 2011 The definition of leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal. Put in even simpler terms, the leader is the inspiration and director of the action. He or she is the person in the group that possesses the combination of personality and skills that makes others want to follow his or her direction (Ward). Which brings us to the mostRead MoreAnalysis Of Hsun Tzu s Man s Nature Is Evil1720 Words   |  7 PagesSome people argue that leaders are born. Others argue that leaders are made because of the environment. Each person believes leaders possess certain characteristics that make them good rulers. I believe leaders are made, they are taught what is wrong and right, and they are taught how to be a certain kind of leader in the context of their environment. I want to discuss what makes someone a good leader. Is a good leader efficient and adaptable or is a good leader born with predetermined qualities

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Finance Running Head

Question: What would you do if you were Rachael? Answer: In this case, if I was Rachael then I would take action against the misstatement of financial statement. In this case, two of the companys largest customers had gone into liquidation as the companys would not able to recover more than 10% of the debts. This situation was grossly inadequate the current allowance for doubtful debts and it was overstated the account receivable. Inadequate current bed debts and overstatement of accounts receivables has not considered while prepared balance sheet to maintain the quick ratio for the purpose of the loan agreement (Bond, 2009). If I was Rachael then I would not consider the point of Olle Twist (accountant of the business) and focused on provide the accurate information in the balance sheet. I would try to convince of Olle Twist to make appropriate changes in balance sheet to represent the appropriate bad debts and account receivables. I would try to explain of Olle that misstatement of account receivables or inappropriate balance sheet is unethical aspects related to the business because it is duties of an accountant to provide the accurate financial information of the companys stakeholders. I would try to convince of Olle to make sufficient change in the balance sheet and if it didnt agreed of it then I would inform directors of the company about this misstatement of balance sheet (Pollock, 2013). I would communicate with the companys directors and inform them about the misstatement of account receivables and inadequate current bad debts as well as tell them about the Olle Twist (accountant) unethical behavior (Jones, Parker and Ten Bos, 2005). References Bond, T. (2009) Standards and Ethics for Counselling in Action. UK: SAGE. Jones, C., Parker, M and Ten Bos, R (2005) For Business Ethics: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge. Pollock, J. (2013) Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justice (8th ed.). USA: Cengage Learning.